Publications

Public Policy Brief No. 20 | April 1995

Assessing the Constitutional Route to Federal Budget Balance

The Balanced Budget Amendment: Toxic, Not Tonic

Charles J. Whalen evaluates the political and economic arguments in favor of a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget and concludes that, although today’s federal budget process needs reform, the balanced budget amendment is not a solution. In fact, such an amendment would divert attention from what is really needed, namely, establishing priorities and making difficult decisions concerning the deficit. It would be damaging to both the economic and the political systems of the United States. He recommends budget alternatives—a full-employment budget, an investment budget, a narrowly defined federal capital budget, a biennial budget—that would give the budgeting process more direction and encourage more restraint than the amendment would.

Download:
Associated Program:
Author(s):
Charles J. Whalen

Publication Highlight

Public Policy Brief No. 144
A Two-Tier Eurozone or a Euro of Regions?
A Radical Proposal Based on Keynes’s Clearing Union
Author(s): Jan Kregel
September 2017

Quick Search

Search in: