Levy Economics Institute of Bard College
COVID-19 Special Edition
Institute News
scholars
Levy Scholars Present at COVID-related Online Events

In the inaugural event of the Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose's (IIPP) virtual series, "Public Purpose in the Time of COVID-19," Senior Scholar Jan Kregel joined Research Associate Stephanie Kelton to discuss macroeconomic responses to COVID-19. Kregel also presented on "Why Stimulus Cannot Solve the Pandemic Depression" as part of the "COVID-19 Pandemic: Policy Failures and Their Impact on the Lives of the People" event, cohosted by the Society for Social and Economic Research (SSER) and International Development Economics Associates (IDEAs). A transcript of his lecture is availble here.

Senior Scholar L. Randall Wray participated in the panel "Financing System Change" at the "Global Leadership in the 21st Century: Strategies for Transformative Global Leadership" conference, hosted by The World Academy of Art and Science in partnership with the United Nations at Geneva. Wray also presented a talk on "Monetary Finance in the Age of Corona Virus: MMT and the Green New Deal," one of several talks in the COVID-19-related "Exit Strategy" workshops hosted by the Economic and Social Research Council's "Rebuilding Macroeconomics" project.

Research Fellow Luiza Nassif Pires was one of several panelists to present at the International Association of Feminist Economics' event, "Feminist Political Economy and COVID-19." Her contribution on "Inequality and COVID-19" explores how inequality is shaping the pandemic's social and economic outcomes.
 
New Publications
sa_may
Strategic Analysis | May 2020
Greece's Economy after COVID-19
Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, Michalis Nikiforos, and Gennaro Zezza

This strategic analysis, by Institute President Dimitri B. Papadimitriou and Research Scholars Michalis Nikiforos and Gennaro Zezza, explores the consequences of various assumptions about aggregate demand, producing a baseline projection for Greece's economy and analyzing a more optimistic scenario in which the European Commission's recently announced Recovery Fund materializes. Acknowledging that this would allow increased public consumption and investment, the authors recommend additional measures to alleviate the pandemic shock's impact and help put the economy back on track when the epidemic has died out.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
ppb_151
Public Policy Brief No. 151, June 2020
Crisis, Austerity, and Fiscal Expenditure in Greece: Recent Experience and Future Prospects in the post-COVID-19 Era
Michalis Nikiforos

Michalis Nikiforos discusses of the relationships between austerity, Greece's macroeconomic performance, debt sustainability, and the provision of healthcare and other social services over the last decade, explaining that the austerity imposed in the name of debt sustainability led to a vicious cycle where each round of austerity led to a deeper recession and, eventually, more austerity. Predicting that the pandemic shock will lead to an explosion of public debt, he suggests policies to address structural imbalances in Greece and throughout the eurozone.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
ppb_149
Public Policy Brief No. 149, 2020
Pandemic of Inequality
Luiza Nassif-Pires, Laura de Lima Xavier, Thomas Masterson, Michalis Nikiforos, and Fernando Rios-Avila


The costs of the COVID-19 pandemic—in terms of both the health risks and economic burdens—will be borne disproportionately by the most vulnerable segments of US society. In this public policy brief, Luiza Nassif-Pires, Laura de Lima Xavier, Thomas Masterson, Michalis Nikiforos, and Fernando Rios-Avila demonstrate that the COVID-19 crisis is likely to widen already-worrisome levels of income, racial, and gender inequality in the United States. Minority and low-income populations are more likely to develop severe infections that can lead to hospitalization and death due to COVID-19; they are also more likely to experience job losses and declines in their well-being.

The authors argue that our policy response to the COVID-19 crisis must be shaped by a responsiveness to these unequally shared burdens—and that a failure to mitigate the regressive impact of the crisis will not only be unjust, it will prolong the pandemic and undermine any ensuing economic recovery efforts. As the authors note, we are in danger of falling victim to a vicious cycle: the pandemic and economic lockdown will worsen inequality; and these inequalities exacerbate the spread of the virus, not to mention further weaken the structure of the US economy.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
pn_20_4
Policy Note 2020/4 | May 2020
Guaranteeing Employment during the Pandemic and Beyond
Pavlina R. Tcherneva

The ongoing job losses, already numbering in the tens of millions, and the mass unemployment that will remain once the COVID-19 crisis has passed are of our own making, argues Pavlina R. Tcherneva, created by our inability to conceive of policies that protect and create jobs on demand. There is another option: instead of capitulating to a world of guaranteed unemployment, we can demand policies that guarantee employment. During the pandemic, the government can protect jobs by acting as a kind of employer of last resort, while in the post-pandemic world it can create jobs directly via mass mobilization and a job guarantee. In this environment, backstopping payrolls, mass mobilization, and the job guarantee are three different but organically linked policies that aim to secure the right to decent, useful, and remunerative employment opportunities for all.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
pn_20_3
Policy Note 2020/3 | April 2020
Immigration Policy Undermines the US Pandemic Response
Martha Tepepa

Research Scholar Martha Tepepa explains how the US response to the COVID-19 crisis will be hindered by its approach to immigration policy. The administration's "zero tolerance" immigration campaign creates a public health risk in the context of this pandemic, and the recent implementation of the "Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds" final rule penalizing noncitizen recipients of some social services will further restrict access to treatment and encumber the fight against the coronavirus.

An earlier version of this note appeared as Working Paper No. 950, "Public Charge in the Time of Coronavirus"

Read complete text (pdf)
 
pn_20_2
Policy Note 2020/2 | March 2020
Stabilizing State and Local Budgets through the Pandemic and Beyond
Alexander Williams

The federal government appears to have abandoned the idea of a coordinated public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving the entirety to state and local governments. Meanwhile, the economic standstill resulting from necessary public health measures will soon cripple state and local budgets. Alexander Williams outlines a proposal for an intragovernmental automatic stabilizer program that would provide a backstop for state and local finances—both during the pandemic and beyond. Without this program, states will be severely constrained in their ability to respond to COVID-19, and balanced budget requirements will force them to cut jobs and raise taxes during the deepest recession in living memory.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
pn20_1
Policy Note 2020/1 | March 2020
When Two Minskyan Processes Meet a Large Shock: The Economic Implications of the Pandemic
Michalis Nikiforos

The spread of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) is a major shock for the US and global economies. Research Scholar Michalis Nikiforos explains that we cannot fully understand the economic implications of the pandemic without reference to two Minskyan processes at play in the US economy: the growing divergence of stock market prices from output prices, and the increasing fragility in corporate balance sheets. The pandemic did not arrive in the context of an otherwise healthy US economy—the demand and supply dimensions of the shock have aggravated an inevitable adjustment process. Using a Minskyan framework, we can understand how the current economic weakness can be perpetuated through feedback effects between flows of demand and supply and their balance sheet impacts.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
op_63
One-Pager No. 63, April 2020
Are We All MMTers Now? Not so Fast
Yeva Nersisyan and L. Randall Wray

As governments around the world explore ambitious approaches to fiscal and monetary policy in their responses to the COVID-19 crisis, Modern Money Theory (MMT) has been thrust into the spotlight once again. Unfortunately, many of those invoking the theory have misrepresented its central tenets, according Yeva Nersisyan and Senior Scholar L. Randall Wray. MMT provides an analysis of fiscal and monetary policy applicable to national governments with sovereign, nonconvertible currencies. In the context of articulating the elements of that analysis, Nersisyan and Wray draw out one of the lessons to be learned from the pandemic and its policy responses: that the government’s ability to run deficits is not limited to times of crisis; that we must build up our supplies, infrastructure, and institutions in normal times, and not wait for the next crisis to live up to our means.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
op_62
One-Pager No. 62, March 2020
The Economic Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic
Yeva Nersisyan and L. Randall Wray

As the coronavirus (COVID-19) spreads across the United States, it has become clear that, in addition to the public health response (which has been far less than adequate), an economic response is needed. Yeva Nersisyan and L. Randall Wray identify four steps that require immediate attention: (1) full coverage of medical costs associated with testing and treatment of COVID-19; (2) mandated paid sick leave and full coverage of associated costs; (3) debt relief for families; and (4) swift deployment of testing and treatment facilities to underserved communities.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
op_61
One-Pager No. 61, March 2020
A Global Slowdown Will Test US Corporate Fragility
Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, Michalis Nikiforos, and Gennaro Zezza

Institute President Dimitri Papadimitriou, and Research Scholars Michalis Nikiforos and Gennaro Zezza report that the rapidly growing uncertainty about the potential global fallout from an emerging pandemic is occurring against a background in which there is evidence US corporate sector balance sheets are significantly overstretched, exhibiting a degree of fragility that, according to some measures, is unmatched in the postwar historical record. The US economy is vulnerable to a shock that could trigger a cascade of falling asset prices and private sector deleveraging, with severe consequences for both the real and financial sides of the economy.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
wp_963
Working Paper No. 963, July 2020
The Early Impact of COVID-19 on Job Losses among Black Women in the United States
Michelle Holder, Janelle Jones, and Thomas Masterson


The COVID-19 pandemic seemingly appeared out of nowhere but changed nearly everything. As the pandemic unfolded, industries deemed nonessential were leveled. Many occupations in these industries are low-wage, and women constitute a greater share of America's low-wage labor force than men. Even as some workers were able to do their jobs from their homes, a high proportion of "essential workers" were African American, other people of color, women, and an intersection of these groups—women of color. The goal of this paper is to closely examine the contours, depth, and causes of COVID-19's impact on Black women's employment in the United States through the lenses of both feminist economic theory and stratification economics.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
wp_950
Working Paper No. 950, April 2020
Public Charge in the Time of Coronavirus
Martha Tepepa


The United States government recently passed legislation and stabilization packages to respond to the COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019) outbreak by providing paid sick leave, tax credits, and free virus testing; expanding food assistance and unemployment benefits; and increasing Medicaid funding. Research Scholar Martha Tepepa asserts that the response to the global pandemic might be hindered by the lassitude of the state and the administration's conception of social policy that leaves the most vulnerable unprotected. The administration's "zero tolerance" immigration campaign poses public health challenges, especially in the prevention of communicable diseases. In addition to the systemic obstacles noncitizens face in their access to healthcare, recent changes to immigration law that penalize recipients of some social services on grounds that they are a public charge will further restrict their access to treatment and hinder the fight against the pandemic.

Read complete text (pdf)
 
blog
New Blog Posts at "The Multiplier Effect"

At the Institute's "Multiplier Effect" blog, our scholars bring you the latest takes on COVID-19's economic and social consequences. Recent posts discuss unemployment and inequality, the increase in domestic violence in households under quarantine, and the economic impacts of nationalizing payrolls.

June 24: The Reserve Bank's Pandemic Predicament by Lekha Chakraborty and Harikrishnan S.

June 2: The Political Economy of Lockdown in India by Harikrishnan S. and Lekha Chakraborty

May 11: Why Stimulus Cannot Solve the Pandemic Depression by Jan Kregel

April 4: What MMT Is, and Why We Should Not Wait for the Next Crisis to Live Up to Our Means by Yeva Nersisyan and L. Randall Wray

April 2: We Need Class, Race, and Gender Sensitive Policies to Fight the COVID-19 Crisis by Luiza Nassif-Pires,Laura de Lima Xavier, Thomas Masterson, Michalis Nikiforos, and Fernando Rios-Avila

March 30: What If We Nationalized Payroll by Pavlina Tcherneva

March 29: Home Quarantine: Confinement With an Abuser by Luiza Nassif-Pires

March 27: The Coronavirus Does Not Discriminate; Unfortunately Our Economic System Does by Thomas Masterson
Media and Web Coverage

As unemployment rates reach levels unseen since the Great Depression, the wealth of America's richest citizens has continued to increase. In a recent interview with ABCNews, Institute President Dimitri Papadimitriou notes that given the "already worrisome levels of income, racial, and gender inequality in the US... we are not 'all in this pandemic together.'"

Citing Research Scholar Michalis Nikiforos' observation that "the record-high stock prices the president routinely touted became disconnected from companies' underlying value," a March 28th Washington Post article by David J. Lynch claims "the pandemic exposed vulnerabilities that had accumulated during a record-long expansion and years of ultralow interest rates—and which now could make it harder to recover from a recession."

The Guardian's April 8th editorial suggests that "what is possible in dealing with coronavirus can be paid for. Money is not the issue." They cite Yeva Nersisyan and Senior Scholar L. Randall Wray's recent assertion in the Multiplier Effect that "the real limits faced by the government before the pandemic hit were far less constraining than the limits faced after the virus had brought a huge part of our productive capacity to a halt" as evidence that "there are more important things to worry about than government debt."

And in their own April 17 op-ed for The Guardian, Nersisyan and Wray stress that Modern Money Theory "is not a prescription, but merely a description of what actually happens," and the current crisis "has clearly demonstrated what should have been obvious already: provisioning society ... is not a financial issue." They suggest we can mobilize our resources in a manner similar to our World War II response, with the hope that "the coronavirus crisis will not be as destructive as the Great Depression, but if there is one thing it should destroy, it's the myth of the deficit."

Because "a viral epidemic, unfortunately, does not just sicken families; it also sickens the economy, and ours is quite vulnerable already," an interest rate cut may not be enough to spur investment and growth as the US formulates its response to COVID-19. In her first of two recent op-eds for MarketWatch, Research Scholar Pavlina R. Tcherneva calls instead for an "aggressive public-health-services mobilization and an economic stabilization package. And that's the job of Congress, not the Fed."

In the second, Tcherneva calls for a wartime-like mobilization of resources, including a federal job guarantee, to ensure the coronavirus pandemic does not lead to a decades of elevated unemployment, suggesting that "only big government, big public investments, and big public-employment programs will ensure a quick bounce back, rather than another protracted jobless recovery," a sentiment she echoes to the New York Times' Peter S. Goodman and The New Yorker's Sheelah Kolhatkar, as well as in several recent interviews. Hear more from her discussion with Bloomberg's financial team, as well as on the Bloomberg Surveillance, Opinion Has It, and Wharton Business Review podcasts, and Hill TV's morning show, Rising.

An assessement of a job guarantee program such as Tcherneva suggests, which directly creates employment in the communities where it is needed while offering $15 per hour and a basic package of benefits, can be found in the Institute's Research Project Report, "Public Service Employment: A Path to Full Employment." The report was recently cited in a Radio New Zealand op-ed supporting a job guarantee as a flexible program that could "be utilized by more people in times of recession and by fewer in prosperous times."

Alexander Williams joins Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway, hosts of Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast, to discuss how his findings in Policy Note, "Stabilizing State and Local Budgets through the Pandemic and Beyond," can help the already-fragile US economy recover from the effects of COVID-19.

A new study on Brazil by Research Fellow Luiza Nassif-Pires (with coauthors Laura Carvalho and Laura Xavier) demonstrates that comorbidities are more prevalent among Brazilians with low educational attainment, indicating that poor people are more likely to be severely affected by COVID-19. Results of their study have been reported on in the Brazilian press, including Folha de São Paulo and Jornal da Universidade de São Paulo. (all links in Portuguese)

On Friday, May 22, Nassif-Pires will be featured at the International Association for Feminist Economics' (IAFFE) third COVID-19-related online event, "Feminist Political Economy and COVID-19." She will be joined by Jennifer Cohen (Miami University) and Smriti Rao (Assumption College) for a panel to be moderated by Radhika Balakrishnan (Rutgers University). The event, beginning at 11am (EDT), is free to attend but registration is required.

Estimating that private demand could be weak for 18 months or more, Research Associate Stephanie Kelton tells Mehdi Hasan of the Intercept's "Deconstructed" podcast that we must "decrease the amount that people are required to pay out each month and increase what's coming in because that's the only way people are going to be able to hold it together." And in her March 21st op-ed for The New York Times, she explains that "only the federal government, has the means to step up and save the economy," suggesting it "can and should use this opportunity to make ambitious, lasting improvements."

Speaking to Daniel Bush of PBS NewsHour on April 2nd, Kelton noted "we had these extreme vulnerabilities" long before the pandemic exposed them, suggesting that "we don't have the robust social safety nets that many European countries have, and we pay the price for that." Her April 8th interview with Bloomberg's Stephanie Flanders suggests, however, that "in spite of the deficits we have run in the past," we have the policy space to take action.

Quoting Wray, Kelton, and frequent Minsky Conference keynote speaker, former PIMCO Chief Economist Paul McCulley, who asserts that "it's an epic moment in terms of breaking down the orthodoxy of church-and-state separation of the fiscal and monetary authority," The New York Times' Matt Phillips uses MMT to illustrate how we can replace "a few months of American economic activity with a flood of government money."
 
         
In This Issue
Institute News: Scholars Present at COVID-related Events
Greece's Economy after COVID-19
Crisis, Austerity, and Fiscal Expenditure in Greece
Pandemic of Inequality
Guaranteeing Employment During the Pandemic and Beyond
Immigration Policy Undermines the US Pandemic Response
Stabilizing State and Local Budgets through the Pandemic and Beyond
When Two Minskyan Processes Meet a Large Shock
Are We All MMTers Now? Not so Fast
The Economic Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic
A Global Slowdown Will Test US Corporate Fragility
The Early Impact of COVID-19 on Job Losses among Black Women in the United States
Public Charge in the Time of Coronavirus
The Multiplier Effect
Web and Media Coverage
Read Our Blog
Multiplier Effect
Levy Book Series
Visit the Institute's Book Series webpage for selected books by our scholars.
Quick Links
Visit Our Website
Research Programs
Graduate Programs
Events
 

You are receiving this e-mail because you either signed up at the Levy Institute website or filled out a request card asking to be placed on this list. If you have trouble accessing the Levy Institute's website, please send a brief description of the problem to tech@levy.org.

Copyright © 1986-2020, Levy Economics Institute, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000. All rights reserved.

No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence, or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
 
Levy InstituteClick to DonateSave