Publications

Working Paper No. 171 | July 1996

Rethinking Health Care Policy—The Case for Retargeting Tax Subsidies

More than 40 million Americans currently have no access to health care for reasons of income. Moreover, plans enacted or discussed at the state level to cover the uninsured face problems of cost and quality of service as well as the question of who pays for such programs. To solve the problem of access, Senior Fellow Walter M. Cadette advocates switching from the current method of financing health care—employment-based health insurance with tax-excluded premiums—to a system that would require everyone to purchase basic but comprehensive coverage with after-tax income. A sliding-scale tax credit, based on level of income, would then be granted. The plan could be paid for with the revenues resulting from eliminating the current exclusion (about $74 billion in federal revenues and $5 billion in state revenues) and the $11 billion the Medicaid program pays to hospitals to assist them in paying for services rendered to those who could not pay for them. The role of the federal government would be to ensure that all plans meet minimum standards of coverage and, possibly, to subsidize part of the cost of high-risk subscribers. State and local governments would channel funds for the insurance of nontaxpayers directly to their insurance carriers. This method of financing health care would eliminate the vertical and horizontal inequities of the existing system and, according to Cadette, encourage individuals to seek out less expensive insurance.

Download:
Author(s):
Walter M. Cadette

Publication Highlight

Research Project Reports
The Macroeconomic Effects of Student Debt Cancellation
Author(s): Scott Fullwiler, Stephanie A. Kelton, Catherine Ruetschlin, Marshall Steinbaum
February 2018

Quick Search

Search in: